Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| An exercise intervention to prevent falls in people with Parkinson's disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
| Goodwin VA, Richards SH, Henley W, Ewings P, Taylor AH, Campbell JL |
| Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2011 Nov;82(11):1232-1238 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of an exercise programme with usual care in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have a history of falls. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Recruitment was from three primary and four secondary care organisations, and PD support groups in South West England. The intervention was delivered in community settings. PARTICIPANTS: People with PD, with a history of two or more falls in the previous year, who were able to mobilise independently. INTERVENTION: 10 week, physiotherapy led, group delivered strength and balance training programme with supplementary home exercises (intervention) or usual care (control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of falls during the (a) 10 week intervention period and (b) the 10 week follow-up period. RESULTS: 130 people were recruited and randomised (64 to the intervention; 66 to usual care). Seven participants (5.4%) did not complete the study. The incidence rate ratio for falls was 0.68 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.07, p = 0.10) during the intervention period and 0.74 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.33, p = 0.31) during the follow-up period. Statistically significant between group differences were observed in Berg balance, Falls Efficacy Scale International scores and recreational physical activity levels. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not demonstrate a statistically significant between group difference in falls although the difference could be considered clinically significant. However, a type 2 error cannot be ruled out. The findings from this trial add to the evidence base for physiotherapy and exercise in the management of people with PD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN50793425.
|