Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The impact of adherence on sports injury prevention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials: looking beyond the CONSORT statement [with consumer summary]
Verhagen EALM, Hupperets MDW, Finch CF, van Mechelen W
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2011 Jul;14(4):287-292
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate estimated outcome effects of a sports injury prevention intervention when analysed by means of a per protocol (PP) analysis approach. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 522 athletes who sustained a lateral ankle sprain allocated to either an intervention (received a preventive programme in addition to usual care) or control group who were followed prospectively for one year. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data relating to registered ankle sprain recurrences, exposure and adherence to the allocated intervention using a PP analysis approach. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of the RCT intervention group indicated to have fully adhered with the neuromuscular training programme. A per protocol analysis only considering fully adherent athletes and control athletes, showed a hazard ratio of 0.18 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.43). Significantly fewer recurrent ankle sprains were found in the fully adherent group compared to the group that was not adherent (relative risk 0.63; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: A PP analysis on fully adherent athletes versus control group athletes showed that the established intervention effect was over threefold higher compared to an earlier intention-to-treat based analysis approach. This shows that outcomes of intervention studies are heavily biased by adherence to the allocated intervention.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help