Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Programas de treinamento muscular respiratorio: impacto na autonomia funcional de idosos (Respiratory muscle training programs: impact on the functional autonomy of the elderly) [Portuguese]
Fonseca MA, Cader SA, Dantas EHM, Bacelar SC, Silva EB, Leal SMO
Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira [Journal of the Brazilian Medical Association] 2010 Nov-Dec;56(6):642-648
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

To compare two respiratory muscle training programs for improving the functional autonomy of institutionalized elderly. Clinical randomized trial conducted at a long stay institution with 42 elderly volunteers that were divided into three groups: group threshold (GT) with mean age (70.93 +/- 8.41), group voldyne (GV) (70.54 +/- 7.73) and control group (CG) (73.92 +/- 7.28). Groups GT and GV were treated with breathing exercises and muscle training by threshold and voldyne, respectively while the CG did just breathing exercises. Training of groups took 10 weeks. To assess the functional autonomy, the elderly were evaluated before and after training, according to the GDLAM protocol. All intra-group comparison (pre x post-test) showed a significant difference in GT for all tests (C10M change% -20.57, p = 0.0001; LPS change% -13.53, p = 0.020; VTC change% -27.96, p = 0.0001; LCLC change% -18.71, p = 0.0001 and IG change% -18.43, p = 0.0001), except in LPDV. In GV there was a significant difference only (p < 0.05) for the C10M (change% -17.11, p = 0.004). In the comparison between (post x post), there was a statistical significance (p < 0.05) for VTC test between the GT and GV (change -3.62%, p = 0.017), with favorable results for the GT. Similarly, there was a statistical difference (p < 0.05) in GT C10M (change% -3.83, p = 0.023), LCLC (change -34.02%, p = 0.012) and IG (change% -13.63, p = 0.004) compared to GC. The trained groups improved functional autonomy, reaching 27.42; considered to be a weak level in both pre-and post-training.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help