Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Biofeedback versus elektrostimulation bei der behandlung der stuhlinkontinenz (Comparison of biofeedback and electrostimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence) [German]
Pages I-H, Lemke J, Grundel K
Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2003 Dec;13(6):325-329
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: No; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of biofeedback training (BF) with electrostimulation for patients with fecal incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study of three therapeutic interventions consisting of BF daily for 4 wk (group 1) or BF daily for 4 wk, followed by a 2-mo home exercise program with BF (group 2) or electrostimulation daily for 3-mo (group 3). 40 patients with fecal incontinence were included. Measurements of fecal frequency, subjective improvement of incontinence and incontinence score were the main outcome measures at initial presentation, after 4 wk therapy program, and at follow-up after 3, 6, 12 mo. Standardized examination of manometric measurements were documented as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Group 1: the daytime fecal incontinence frequency decreased 71% after 4 wk of therapy and 42% after 12 mo (p = 0.001) from baseline. The continence score was reduced by 43% after 4 wk of therapy and 25% after 12 mo (p = 0.0001). Group 2: the daytime fecal incontinence frequency decreased 50% after 4 wk of therapy and 86% after 12 mo (p = 0.005) from baseline. The continence score was reduced by 10% after 4 wk of therapy and 30% after 12 mo (p = 0.006). Group 3: the daytime fecal incontinence frequency was reduced, but no statistically significant improvement. The continence score decreased 19% after 4 wk of therapy and 23% after 12 mo (p = 0.046). Results of manometric measurements showed statistically significant improvement in all variables in 3 groups after 3, 6, 12 mo. A comparison between the therapy groups did not reveal any significant differences. CONCLUSION: BF and electrostimulation are effective therapies for fecal incontinence and result in a significantly reduced fecal frequency and continence score. BF therapy resulted in a better subjective outcome and higher contraction pressures of the sphincter and pelvic-floor muscles.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help