Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Electric stimulation as an adjunct to heal diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial |
Peters EJ, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Fleischli JG |
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001 Jun;82(6):721-725 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: Yes; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate high-voltage, pulse-galvanic electric stimulation as an adjunct to healing diabetic foot ulcers. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Forty patients with diabetic foot ulcers, consecutively sampled. Twenty patients each assigned to treatment and placebo groups. Five patients (2 treated, 3 placebo) withdrew because of severe infection. INTERVENTIONS: Electric stimulation through a microcomputer every night for 8 hours. The placebo group used identical functioning units that delivered no current. Additional wound care consisted of weekly debridements, topical hydrogel, and off-loading with removable cast walkers. Patients were followed for 12 weeks or until healing, whichever occurred first. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of wounds that healed during the study period. Compliance with use of device tin hr/wk), rate of wound healing, and time until healing. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of the patients healed in the group treated with stimulation, whereas 35% healed with placebo (p = 0.058), After stratification by compliance, a significant difference was identified among compliant patients in the treatment group (71% healed), noncompliant patients in the treatment group (50% healed), compliant patients in the placebo group (39% healed), and noncompliant patients in the placebo group (29% healed, linear-by-linear association = 4.32 (v = 0.038). There was no significant difference in compliance between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Electric simulation enhances wound healing when used in conjunction with appropriate off-loading and local wound care.
|