Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Electric stimulation as an adjunct to heal diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial
Peters EJ, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Fleischli JG
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001 Jun;82(6):721-725
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: Yes; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate high-voltage, pulse-galvanic electric stimulation as an adjunct to healing diabetic foot ulcers. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Forty patients with diabetic foot ulcers, consecutively sampled. Twenty patients each assigned to treatment and placebo groups. Five patients (2 treated, 3 placebo) withdrew because of severe infection. INTERVENTIONS: Electric stimulation through a microcomputer every night for 8 hours. The placebo group used identical functioning units that delivered no current. Additional wound care consisted of weekly debridements, topical hydrogel, and off-loading with removable cast walkers. Patients were followed for 12 weeks or until healing, whichever occurred first. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of wounds that healed during the study period. Compliance with use of device tin hr/wk), rate of wound healing, and time until healing. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of the patients healed in the group treated with stimulation, whereas 35% healed with placebo (p = 0.058), After stratification by compliance, a significant difference was identified among compliant patients in the treatment group (71% healed), noncompliant patients in the treatment group (50% healed), compliant patients in the placebo group (39% healed), and noncompliant patients in the placebo group (29% healed, linear-by-linear association = 4.32 (v = 0.038). There was no significant difference in compliance between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Electric simulation enhances wound healing when used in conjunction with appropriate off-loading and local wound care.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help