Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Trial of prevention and reduction of obesity through active living in clinical settings: a randomized controlled trial
Ross R, Lam M, Blair SN, Church TS, Godwin M, Hotz SB, Johnson A, Katzmarzyk PT, Lvesque L, MacDonald S
Archives of Internal Medicine 2012 Mar 12;172(5):414-424
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of physical activity with a healthful diet to reduce obesity is established; however, little is known about the translation of effective lifestyle strategies for obesity reduction in primary care settings. METHODS: We assessed the effectiveness of a 2-year behaviorally based physical activity and diet program implemented entirely within clinical practices to reduce obesity. A total of 490 sedentary, obese adults were randomized to usual care (n = 241) or to the behavioral intervention (n = 249). The usual care group received advice from their physicians about lifestyle as a strategy for obesity reduction. The behavioral intervention included individual counseling from health educators to promote physical activity with a healthful diet. The primary outcome was change in waist circumference (WC). RESULTS: A total of 396 participants completed the trial (80.8%). A significant main effect was observed for WC change within the intervention compared with usual care (p < 0.001) that was sustained at 24 months (mean (SE) -0.9 (0.4) versus 0.2 (0.4) cm; p = 0.05). Secondary analyses revealed significant main effects for change in WC in men (p = 0.009) and women (p = 0.02). In men, the mean (SE) reduction in WC at 24 months was greater with behavioral intervention compared with usual care (-1.6 (0.6) versus 0.1 (0.6) cm; p = 0.049). In women, the behavioral intervention was associated with differences in WC compared with usual care at 6 and 12 months (p <= 0.01) but not at 24 months (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral intervention in clinical settings is associated with modest reductions in WC during a 2-year study in obese patients. However, the effectiveness of the intervention is restricted to men. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00665158.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help