Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Multicenter randomized controlled trial of pediatric constraint-induced movement therapy: 6-month follow-up [with consumer summary]
Case-Smith J, de Luca SC, Stevenson R, Ramey Sl
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2012 Jan-Feb;66(1):15-23
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a promising intervention for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP). This multisite randomized controlled trial (RCT) tested the hypothesis that 6 hr versus 3 hr per day for 21 days would produce larger maintenance of gains 6 mo posttreatment. METHOD: Three sites recruited 18 children (6 per site) ages 3 to 6 yr with unilateral CP. Children were randomly assigned 3 to 6 hr/day of CIMT for 21 days and wore a cast on the unaffected extremity the first 18 days. Occupational therapists applied a standardized pediatric CIMT protocol. Evaluators blinded to condition administered the Assisted Hand Assessment and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test, and parents completed the Pediatric Motor Activity Log pre- and posttreatment (1 wk, 1 mo, and 6 mo). RESULTS: Both CIMT dosage groups showed significant gains on all five assessments with no significant group differences at 6 mo follow-up. Effect sizes (n = 15) comparing preintervention to postintervention measures (partial n2) ranged from 0.33 to 0.80. CONCLUSION: The first multisite RCT of pediatric CIMT confirmed the maintenance of positive effects at 6 mo follow-up across multiple functional performance measures. The hypothesis that maintenance of effects would differ for children who received 6 versus 3 hr/day of CIMT (126 versus 63 total hr) was not supported.
Copyright by the Amerrican Occupational Therapy Association Inc. Reprinted with permission.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help