Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? |
Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ, Mah CA, Kraemer FB, Crapo LM |
The American Journal of Medicine 2000 Jan;108(1):20-27 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the effect of automated telephone assessment and self-care education calls with nurse follow-up on the management of diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 280 English- or Spanish-speaking adults with diabetes who were using hypoglycemic medications and who were treated in a county health care system. Patients were randomly assigned to usual care or to receive an intervention that consisted of usual care plus bi-weekly automated assessment and self-care education calls with telephone follow-up by a nurse educator. Outcomes measured at 12 months included survey-reported self-care, perceived glycemic control, and symptoms, as well as glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and serum glucose levels. RESULTS: We collected follow-up data for 89% of enrollees (248 patients). Compared with usual care patients, intervention patients reported more frequent glucose monitoring, foot inspection, and weight monitoring, and fewer problems with medication adherence (all p < 0.03). Follow-up HbA1c levels were 0.3% lower in the intervention group (p = 0.1), and about twice as many intervention patients had HbA1c levels within the normal range (p = 0.04). Serum glucose levels were 41 mg/dL lower among intervention patients than usual care patients (p = 0.002). Intervention patients also reported better glycemic control (p = 0.005) and fewer diabetic symptoms (p < 0.0001), including fewer symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up may be an effective strategy for improving self-care behavior and glycemic control, and for decreasing symptoms among vulnerable patients with diabetes.
|