Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Functional orthosis in shoulder joint subluxation after ischaemic brain stroke to avoid post-hemiplegic shoulder-hand syndrome: a randomized clinical trial [with consumer summary] |
| Hartwig M, Gelbrich G, Griewing B |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2012 Sep;26(9):807-816 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the use of a shoulder joint functional orthosis over four weeks can mitigate the development or progression of the shoulder-hand syndrome in patients with shoulder joint subluxation after stroke. DESIGN: Two-armed randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation unit of a neurological hospital, single centre. SUBJECTS: Forty-one patients with caudal subluxation of the glenohumeral joint and hemiparesis of the upper extremity after ischaemic brain stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Support by functional orthosis Neuro-Lux (Sporlastic, Nurtingen, Germany) on top of usual care according to current guidelines (experimental, n = 20) versus usual care alone (control, n = 21). MAIN MEASURES: Weekly shoulder-hand syndrome scores (severity of clinical symptoms ranging from 0 to 14), discomfort caused by the orthosis, and its usage rate. The primary outcome was the average shoulder-hand syndrome score on days 14, 21 and 28, adjusted for the baseline shoulder-hand syndrome score. RESULTS: The adjusted mean shoulder-hand syndrome score was lower by 3.1 in the intervention compared to the control subjects (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 4.3, p < 0.0001). Marginal or no discomfort from treatment with the orthosis was reported in 15 patients (75%), and only a single patient (5%) felt severe discomfort during the entire treatment. Use of the orthosis during the prescribed time was 89%. CONCLUSIONS: The orthosis examined in this trial has been successfully shown to reduce and prevent the development of clinical symptoms of shoulder-hand syndrome. Timing and duration of application of the orthosis as well as its combination with other therapeutic measures should be investigated in future clinical trials.
|