Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Extension traction treatment for patients with discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Moustafa IM, Diab AA |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 Jan;27(1):51-62 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of lumbar extension traction in patients with unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy due to L5-S1 disc herniation. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study with six-month follow-up. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Sixty-four patients with confirmed unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy due to L5-S1 disc herniation and a lumbar lordotic angle less than 39 degrees, randomly assigned to traction or control group. INTERVENTIONS: The control group (n = 32) received hot packs and interferential therapy, whereas the traction group (n = 32) received lumbar extension traction in addition to hot packs and interferential therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Absolute rotatory angle, back and leg pain rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Modified Schober test, H-reflex (latency and amplitude) and intervertebral movements were measured for all patients three times (before treatment, after 10 weeks of treatment and at six-month follow-up). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the traction group and the control group adjusted to baseline values at 10 weeks post treatment with respect to: absolute rotatory angle (p < 0.001), Oswestry Disability Index (p = 0.002), back and leg pain (p = 0.009, p = 0.005), Modified Schober test (p = 0.002), latency and amplitude of H-reflex (p = 0.01, p < 0.001), intervertebral movements (p < 0.05). At six-month follow-up there were statistically significant differences between the study and control groups for all the previous variables (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The traction group receiving lumbar extension traction in addition to hot packs and interferential therapy had better effects than the control group with regard to pain, disability, H-reflex parameters and segmental intervertebral movements.
|