Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Six and 12 months' effects of individual joint protection education in people with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial
Niedermann K, Buchi S, Ciurea A, Kubli R, Steurer-Stey C, Villiger PM, de Bie RA
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2012 Jul;19(4):360-369
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Joint protection (JP) education for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is effective when applying psycho-educational teaching strategies. The Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) was used to identify relevant JP education goals and life aspects, both supporting motivation and behaviour change. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of individual JP education, PRISM-based (PRISM-JP) versus conventional (C-JP), in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in four rheumatology centres. Patients were randomized to PRISM-JP or C-JP, consisting of five JP education sessions over three months. Primary outcome was JP behaviour at six and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 53 RA patients participated. The PRISM-JP group (n = 26) demonstrated significantly more JP behaviour at six months (effect size ES 0.32; p = 0.02) and 12 months (ES 0.28; p = 0.04) than the C-JP (n = 27). Within-group analysis showed that the JP intervention was successful at six and 12 months in both groups (p < 0.001). At 12 months the PRISM-JP group had better JP self-efficacy (p = 0.02) and grip strength (p = 0.04) compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: PRISM-JP was more effective than C-JP in terms of long-term JP behaviour at six and 12 months.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help