Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects of high-impact training and detraining on femoral neck structure in premenopausal women: a hip structural analysis of an 18-month randomized controlled exercise intervention with 3.5-year follow-up [with consumer summary] |
Heinonen A, Mantynen J, Kannus P, Uuusi-Rasi K, Nikander R, Kontulainen S, Sievanen H |
Physiotherapy Canada 2012 Winter;64(1):98-105 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the training effects of an 18-month exercise intervention and subsequent 3.5-year follow-up on femoral neck structure in premenopausal women. METHODS: Of 98 women who participated in this randomized controlled study, 84 (39 trainees and 45 controls) completed the 18-month intervention. At both 18 months and 3.5 years, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry data on 22 trainees and 22 control participants (ages 35 to 45 y) were available for hip structural analysis. The section modulus (Z), cross-sectional area (CSA), and subperiosteal width at the femoral neck were analyzed. Lower-leg explosive power and estimated maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) were assessed by vertical countermovement jump and standardized 2 km walking test respectively. Progressive supervised high-impact exercises were done three times per week for 18 months. RESULTS: Significant between-group differences in favour of trainees were observed after the 18-month intervention in Z (3.2%, p = 0.047) and CSA (2.8%, p = 0.043). At the 3.5-year follow-up point, the exercise-induced benefits in Z and CSA had diminished and were statistically insignificant. A between-group difference in favour of trainees was observed in lower-limb power after intervention (4.2%, p = 0.002) and at 3.5-year follow-up (5.1%, p = 0.003). A similar difference was seen in estimated VO2max (5.6% after intervention, p = 0.002, and 4.6% at 3.5-y follow-up, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The 18-month high-impact exercise intervention strengthened the femoral neck in premenopausal women by enhancing its structural properties; however, this benefit was not maintained at 3.5-year follow-up. In contrast, the exercise benefits on physical performance continued to be maintained 3.5 years after intervention.
|