Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Physical activity and dietary behavior change in internet-based weight loss interventions: comparing two multiple-behavior change indices [with consumer summary]
Carlson JA, Sallis JF, Ramirez ER, Patrick K, Norman GJ
Preventive Medicine 2012 Jan 1;54(1):50-54
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of two internet-based weight loss interventions on physical activity (PA) and dietary behaviors using two approaches for computing combined behavior change. METHOD: Participants were 352 overweight/obese women and men completing 12-month interventions in San Diego, California during 2002 to 2007. Moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and sedentary time were measured with accelerometers, and dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake were assessed with food frequency questionnaires. Longitudinal analyses tested the effect of the intervention on combined health behavior change quantified using a standardized residualized change index (SRCI) and a risk factor change index (RFCI). RESULTS: At baseline, participants engaged in an average of 153 min/week of MVPA and 525 min/day of sedentary time, and consumed 37% of calories from fat and < 3 fruits and vegetables per day. The interventions had a significant effect on combined behavior change as measured with each approach (p < 0.001). The intervention effect was larger (p < 0.001) when evaluated using the SRCI (standardized regression coefficient (beta) = 0.30) than the RFCI (beta = -0.18). CONCLUSION: Interventions that target both PA and dietary behaviors appear effective. The SRCI was more sensitive for evaluating the intervention, but the RFCI may be easier to use for communicating public health significance.
Copyright by Academic Press.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help