Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| What do family members notice following an intervention to improve mobility and incontinence care for nursing home residents? An analysis of open-ended comments | 
| Levy-Storms L, Schnelle JF, Simmons SF | 
| The Gerontologist 2007 Feb;47(1):14-20 | 
| clinical trial | 
| 2/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* | 
| 
                     PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of family members' responses to open-ended interview questions about an intervention to improve incontinence and mobility care for their relative in a nursing home. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a randomized, controlled intervention trial with incontinent nursing home residents (n = 145), wherein research staff provided toileting and walking assistance of sufficient intensity to significantly improve continence and mobility outcomes in the treatment group. Interviewers posed open-ended interview questions to family members after 8 weeks of intervention to assess if they noticed a difference in care. RESULTS: Family responses to open-ended questions showed that, compared to the control group, the intervention group noticed significant overall improvement in incontinence and mobility care and in residents' outcomes in mobility. IMPLICATIONS: Families' responses to open-ended questions were sensitive to improvements in incontinence and mobility care and may provide evidence for important care quality differences that would be missed if only direct satisfaction and discrepancy-based closed-ended questions were asked.  
  |