Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a community weight management intervention: a randomized controlled trial of the health weight management demonstration [with consumer summary] |
Hersey JC, Khavjou O, Strange LB, Atkinson RL, Blair SN, Campbell S, Hobbs CL, Kelly B, Fitzgerald TM, Kish-Doto J, Koch MA, Munoz B, Peele E, Stockdale J, Augustine C, Mitchell G, Arday D, Kugler J, Dorn P, Ellzy J, Julian R, Grissom J, Britt M |
Preventive Medicine 2012 Jan 1;54(1):42-49 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
PURPOSE: The study investigated the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral weight management program, complemented by an interactive web site and brief telephone/e-mail coaching. METHODS: In 2006 to 2007, 1,755 overweight, non-active-duty TRICARE beneficiaries were randomized to one of three conditions with increasing intervention intensity: written materials and basic web access (RCT1), plus an interactive web site (RCT2), plus brief telephone/e-mail coaching support (RCT3). The study assessed changes in weight, blood pressure, and physical activity from baseline to 6, 12, and 15 to 18 months. (Study retention was 31% at 12 months). Average and incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-offset analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Participants experienced significant weight loss (-4.0%, -4.0%, and -5.3%, respectively, in each RCT group after 12 months and -3.5%, -3.8%, and -5.1%, respectively, after 15 to 18 months), increased physical activity, and decreased blood pressure. Cost-effectiveness ratios were $900 to $1,100/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for RCT1 and RCT2 and $1,900/QALY for RCT3. The cost recovery period to the government was 3 years for RCTs 1 and 2 and 6 years for RCT3. CONCLUSION: A relatively inexpensive cognitive-behavioral weight management intervention improved patient outcomes. Extrapolation of savings for the entire TRICARE population would significantly reduce direct medical costs.
|