Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Efficacy of splinting and oral steroids in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized clinical and electrophysiological study |
| Mishra S, Prabhakar S, Lal V, Modi M, Das CP, Khurana D |
| Neurology India 2006 Jul-Sep;54(3):286-290 |
| clinical trial |
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of splinting and oral steroids in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label, clinical and electrophysiological study with 3-month follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with CTS were randomly divided into splint group (n = 20), wearing splint in neutral position for 4 weeks; and steroid group (n = 20), who received oral prednisolone 20 mg/day for 2 weeks followed by 10 mg/day for 2 weeks. Clinical and electrophysiological evaluations were done at baseline and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up. Independent 't' test and paired 't' test were used for statistical analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the symptom severity score and functional status score. Secondary outcome measures were median nerve sensory and motor distal latency and conduction velocity. RESULTS: At the end of 3 months, statistically significant improvement was seen in symptom severity score and functional status score in both groups (p < 0.001). Median nerve sensory distal latency and conduction velocity also improved significantly in both the groups at 3 months. Improvement in motor distal latency was significant (p = 0.001) at 3 months in steroid group, while insignificant improvement (p = 0.139) was observed in splint group. On comparing the clinical and electrophysiological improvement between the two groups, except for the functional status score, there was no significant difference at 3-month follow-up. Improvement in functional status score was significantly more in steroid group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: There was significant improvement in both groups, clinically as well as electrophysiologically, at 3 months. On comparing the efficacy of the two treatment methods, except for the functional status score, there was no significant difference between the two groups.
|