Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

An aerobic walking programme versus muscle strengthening programme for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Shnayderman I, Katz-Leurer M
Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 Mar;27(3):207-214
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of aerobic walking training as compared to active training, which includes muscle strengthening, on functional abilities among patients with chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial with blind assessors. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. SUBJECTS: Fifty-two sedentary patients, aged 18 to 65 years with chronic low back pain. Patients who were post surgery, post trauma, with cardiovascular problems, and with oncological disease were excluded. INTERVENTION: Experimental 'walking' group: moderate intense treadmill walking; control 'exercise' group: specific low back exercise; both, twice a week for six weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Six-minute walking test, Fear-Avoidance Belief Questionnaire, back and abdomen muscle endurance tests, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Low Back Pain Functional Scale (LBPFS). RESULTS: Significant improvements were noted in all outcome measures in both groups with non-significant difference between groups. The mean distance in metres covered during 6 minutes increased by 70.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.3 to 127.7) in the 'walking' group and by 43.8 (95% CI 19.6 to 68.0) in the 'exercise' group. The trunk flexor endurance test showed significant improvement in both groups, increasing by 0.6 (95% CI 0.0 to 1.1) in the 'walking' group and by 1.1 (95% CI 0.3 to 1.8) in the 'exercise' group. CONCLUSIONS: A six-week walk training programme was as effective as six weeks of specific strengthening exercises programme for the low back.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help