Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Is surface EMG biofeedback an effective training method for persons with neck and shoulder complaints after whiplash-associated disorders concerning activities of daily living and pain -- a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Ehrenborg C, Archenholtz B |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2010 Aug;24(8):715-726 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: No; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of surface electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback training as a supplement to an interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme regarding consequences for activities of daily living and pain. DESIGN: A randomized controlled unblinded trial. SETTINGS: The study was carried out in a pain unit at a rehabilitation centre. SUBJECTS: Sixty-five people with chronic whiplash-associated disorders consecutively referred to the pain unit agreed to participate in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. INTERVENTION: All participants received interdisciplinary rehabilitation and the treatment group also had four weeks of surface EMG biofeedback training. MAIN MEASURES: The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was used at admission discharge and at six-month follow-up to register changes in activities of daily living. The Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Swedish version, was used at admission and at six-month follow-up to capture the multidimensional aspects of pain. RESULTS: Sixty-two people completed the study. Both treatment and control groups improved significantly according to the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure at discharge and the results remained after six months (p < 0.001). The subscale 'Interference' on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory was significantly decreased at six months for the treatment group (p < 0.001). No differences were found between the two groups for activities of daily living (performance p = 0.586; satisfaction p = 0.988) at follow-up or for pain level (p = 0.914), indicating no additional effect of the surface EMG biofeedback training. CONCLUSION: In this study there was no support for the effectiveness of surface EMG biofeedback training as a supplement to an interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme for people with long-lasting pain after whiplash.
|