Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Linear and daily undulating resistance training periodizations have differential beneficial effects in young sedentary women
de Lima C, Boullosa DA, Frollini AB, Donatto FF, Leite RD, Gonelli PRG, Montebello MIL, Prestes J, Cesar MC
International Journal of Sports Medicine 2012 Sep;33(9):723-727
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

The aim of this randomized controlled study was to verify the impact of a 12-weeks muscular endurance (ME) training of high repetitions (ie, 15 to 30) with 2 different periodization models on body composition, maximal strength, muscular endurance and cardiorespiratory fitness. Twenty eight sedentary women aged 20 to 35 years were randomly assigned to: control (CON) (n = 8), linear periodization (LP) (n = 10) and daily undulating periodization (DUP) (n = 10). LP and DUP models significantly improved body composition, maximal strength and ME. However, no significant changes were detected for cardiorespiratory fitness. LP showed a higher body fat loss (-12.73%) compared to DUP (-9.93%) (p = 0.049), and systematically higher effect sizes (ES) when compared with DUP for maximal strength and cardiorespiratory fitness parameters (eg, ES 0.53 for ventilatory threshold). In contrast, DUP exhibited a significantly (p = 0.002) greater ME gain (129.43%) compared to LP (70.72%) in bench press, and greater ES in all exercises. It may be suggested that LP performed with a high number of repetitions may be considered an appropriate periodization model for untrained young women that would likely lead to the improvement of body composition and maximum strength performance, whereas DUP is more effective for the development of ME.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help