Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Impact of a geriatric assessment unit on subsequent health care charges
Applegate WB, Graney MJ, Miller ST, Elam JT
American Journal of Public Health 1991 Oct;81(10):1302-1306
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: In a recent randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of an inpatient geriatric assessment unit (GAU), we demonstrated that patients assigned to the unit were less likely than those in the usual care group to be admitted to a nursing home and more likely to remain living in the community. Despite evidence of benefits of GAU care, questions remain about its cost. We examine the impact of GAU treatment on subsequent health care charges. METHODS: Sequential referrals of elderly disabled patients considered at risk for institutionalization or likely to improve with rehabilitation were randomized to the GAU or to usual care. Charge data were collected on utilization of a wide variety of health care services starting at the point of randomization. RESULTS: The group randomized to the GAU experienced significantly higher rehabilitation charges per participant ($10,583 versus $2,066, p = 0.0001), but lower mean nursing home charges ($1,798 versus $3,426, p = 0.004). Total health care charges per participant over the 1 year follow-up were greater for the GAU group ($28,406 versus $16,444, p = 0.004). When charges were adjusted per year of life survived, the GAU group still showed a substantial (but nonsignificant, p = 0.10) increase in total charges. However, when charges were adjusted per day subsequently spent residing in the community, adjusted total charges were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that improved outcomes from GAU care require an investment in rehabilitation that is not totally offset by decreased institutional charges in the following year.
Copyright by the American Public Health Association.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help