Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Rationale for earlier treatment in COPD: a systematic review of published literature in mild-to-moderate COPD
Maltais F, Dennis N, Chan CKN
COPD 2013;10(1):79-103
systematic review

COPD is progressive and typically begins many years before a definite diagnosis is made. As the rate of decline in lung function may be faster in the initial stages of the disease, early intervention could be beneficial to control symptoms and affect disease progression and outcomes. A systematic review of published literature relating to mild-to-moderate COPD (patients with FEV1 >= 50% predicted) was performed to evaluate the level of impairment and natural history or disease progression over time, and impact of interventions on the outcomes of patients with early-stage disease. Of the 79 published articles included in this analysis, 31 reported randomized controlled trials; the remaining 48 articles reported studies of non-randomized and/or observational design. Nine of the randomized controlled trials were >= 6 months' duration, enabling assessment of outcomes over time. Most of the randomized controlled trials were in patients with moderate COPD (GOLD stage II); few included patients with the mildest stages of the disease (ie, stage I). The results show that even patients with milder or moderate COPD can have substantial limitations and physical impairment, which worsen over time. Encouragement of smoking cessation, in conjunction with management of symptoms and treating activity limitation and exacerbations by appropriate non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic management at the earliest possible stage, could positively affect the impact and progression of the disease.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help