Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effective group training for patients with unexplained physical symptoms: a randomized controlled trial with a non-randomized one-year follow-up |
Zonneveld LNL, van Rood YR, Timman R, Kooiman CG, van't Spijker A, Busschbach JJV |
PLoS ONE 2012 Aug 7;7(8):e42629 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Although cognitive-behavioral therapy for unexplained physical symptoms (UPS) is effective in secondary care, studies done in primary care produced implementation problems and conflicting results. We evaluated the effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral group training tailored to primary care patients and provided by a secondary community mental-health service reaching out into primary care. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The effectiveness of this training was explored in a randomized controlled trial. In this trial, 162 patients with UPS classified as undifferentiated somatoform disorder or as chronic pain disorder were randomized either to the training or a waiting list. Both lasted 13 weeks. The preservation of the training's effect was analyzed in non-randomized follow-ups, for which the waiting group started the training after the waiting period. All patients attended the training were followed-up after three months and again after one year. The primary outcomes were the physical and the mental summary scales of the SF-36. Secondary outcomes were the other SF-36-scales and the SCL-90-R. The courses of the training's effects in the randomized controlled trial and the follow-ups were analyzed with linear mixed modeling. In the randomized controlled trial, the training had a significantly positive effect on the quality of life in the physical domain (Cohen's d = 0.38; p = 0.002), but this overall effect was not found in the mental domain. Regarding the secondary outcomes, the training resulted in reporting an improved physical (Cohen's d = 0.43; p = 0.01), emotional (Cohen's d = 0.44; p = 0.01), and social (Cohen's d = 0.36; p = 0.01) functioning, less pain and better functioning despite pain (Cohen's d = 0.51; p =< 0.001), less physical symptoms (Cohen's d = -.23; p = 0.05) and less sleep difficulties (Cohen's d = -0.25; p = 0.04) than time in the waiting group. During the non-randomized follow-ups, there were no relapses. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The cognitive-behavioral group training tailored for UPS in primary care and provided by an outreaching secondary mental-health service appears to be effective and to broaden the accessibility of treatment for UPS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TrialRegister.nl NTR1609.
|