Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Impact of the clinical practice guideline for preservation of upper limb function on transfer skills of persons with acute spinal cord injury
Rice LA, Smith I, Kelleher AR, Greenwald K, Hoelmer C, Boninger ML
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013 Jul;94(7):1230-1246
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: To describe the development of a strict education protocol to implement the clinical practice guideline "Preservation of Upper Limb Function Following Spinal Cord Injury" into a clinical setting and evaluate the effect of the protocol on transfer quality. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Acute Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems Rehabilitation Facility and community. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer sample of 70 full time wheelchair users with new spinal cord injuries randomized (1:1) to an intervention and standard of care group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of transfer quality evaluated by the Transfer Assessment Instrument at four time points during first year after injury. INTERVENTION: The intervention group was educated on transfer skills with a structured protocol implemented by a physical and occupational therapist who were extensively educated on the clinical practice guidelines and current transfer research. The standard of care group received standard therapy services. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between study groups. Secondary analysis based on type of transfer performed found that participants in the intervention group who performed assisted sitting pivot transfers performed higher quality transfers (mean 9.43, SE 0.55) compared to the standard of care group (mean 7.81, SE 0.46), p = 0.026 at one year after discharge. Also, participants who performed a dependent transfer had a higher average score across all four time points (mean 9.14, SE 0.34) compared to the standard of care group (mean 8.09, SE 0.29), p = 0.019. CONCLUSION: For participants who perform assisted or dependent transfers, use of an evidenced based, structured education program during acute inpatient rehabilitation has potential to significantly improve the quality of transfers. Further follow up testing is necessary with a larger sample size to determine the long term effects.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help