Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The effects of manual hyperinflation with or without rib-cage compression in mechanically ventilated patients
Genc A, Akan M, Gunerli A
Italian Journal of Physiotherapy 2011 Jun;1(2):48-54
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

AIM: Manual hyperinflation and expiratory rib-cage compression are physiotherapeutic techniques used to remove airway secretions in intensive care patients. This study was performed to investigate the effects of manual hyperinflation with or without expiratory rib-cage compression on lung compliance, gas exchange, and secretion clearance in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Twenty-two intubated, mechanically ventilated, and hemodynamically stable intensive care unit patients were studied in a controlled, randomized, case-crossover trial. The patients received manual hyperinflation, with or without expiratory rib-cage compression, with a minimum 3-h interval between the two interventions. Manual hyperinflation with or without expiratory rib-cage compression was performed for 5 min before endotracheal suctioning. Respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic variables were measured 5 min before (baseline) and then 5 and 20 min after the interventions. Arterial blood gases were determined 5 min before (baseline) and 20 min after the interventions. Secretion clearance was measured as sputum weight. The two measurements were obtained on the same day. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in gas exchange and secretion clearance between the two interventions. In each case, static lung compliance and tidal volume improved significantly at 5 min post-intervention (p < 0.01), whereas at 20 min post-intervention, only static lung compliance had improved significantly above baseline (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the addition of expiratory rib-cage compression to manual hyperinflation does not improve lung compliance, gas exchange, or secretion clearance in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help