Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Adapted physical activity is beneficial on balance, functional mobility, quality of life and fall risk in community-dwelling older women: a randomized single-blinded controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Kovacs E, Prokai L, Meszaros L, Gondos T
European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2013 Jun;49(3):301-310
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes have important role in prevention of falls, but to date, we have little knowledge about the effects of adapted physical activity programme on balance of older women. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of an adapted physical activity programme on balance, risk of falls and quality of life in community-dwelling older women. DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled study. SETTING: Community, in a local sport centre. POPULATION: Older women aged over 60 years. METHODS: Seventy-six women were randomised to an exercise group providing adapted physical activity programme for 25 weeks or a control group (in which they did not participate in any exercise programme). The one-leg stance test, Timed Up and Go test, incidence of fall and the quality of life (SF-36v2) were measured at baseline and after 25 weeks. RESULTS: The one-leg stance test and the Timed Up and Go test in the exercise group was significantly better than in the control group after the intervention period (p = 0.005; p = 0.001, respectively). The Physical Functioning, Vitality and General Health subdomains of quality of life were also significantly better in the exercise group compared to the control group (p = 0.004; p = 0.005; p = 0.038, respectively). Relative risk was 0.40 (90% CI 0.174 to 0.920) and the number needed to treat was 5 (95% CI 2.3 to 23.3). CONCLUSION: This 25-week adapted physical activity programme improves static balance, functional mobility, as well as Physical Functioning, Vitality and General Health subdomains of quality of life.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help