Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Lateral epicondylalgia: report of noneffective midlaser treatment
Haker EHK, Lundeberg TCM
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1991 Nov;72(12):984-988
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: Yes; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

This study was carried out to explore the pain-alleviating effect of Ga-As+He-Ne laser (gallium-arsenide+helium-neon) in lateral epicondylalgia. A Space Mid Laser Mix 5-up laser was used. The probe consisted of five Ga-As emitters and one He-Ne emitter in the center. The parameters for Ga-As were wavelength 904 nm; average output power 4 mW, peak power 10 W; pulse frequency 3,800 Hz; pulse duration 180 nsec; divergence 70 mrad. The He-Ne parameters were wavelength 632.8 nm; continuous; power output 4 mW, divergence 60 mrad. A pen laser (Ga-As) was also included in the equipment. Two machines were available; one of them had no output in the Ga-As diodes, and the He-Ne emitter was replaed with a red light emitter. Fifty-eight patients were consecutively assigned to two groups for laser or placebo. The probe was applied perpendicularly over the painful area for eight minutes, and then the pen probe was applied to two acupuncture points, LI 11 and LI 12, for two minutes per point. The treatments were given three to four times weekly, ten treatments in all. Follow-ups were done after 3, 6, and 12 months. The treatment procedure was performed exactly according to the manufacturer's manual for this diagnosis. No other therapeutic measures were used, and medication use was proscribed during the treatments and the follow-up period. The statistical analysis showed no significant differences in subjective or objective outcome between the laser and placebo treatments after the treatment period. However, the objective outcome indicated a difference in favour of the placebo treatment (p < 0.06). No differences were seen at follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Our results do not support the use of Space Mid Laser Mix 5-up laser treatment with the chosen parameters in lateral epicondylalgia.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help