Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Does altering inclination alter effectiveness of treadmill training for gait impairment after stroke? A randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Carda S, Invernizzi M, Baricich A, Cognolato G, Cisari C |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 Oct;27(10):932-938 |
| clinical trial |
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a downhill walking training programme is more effective than the same amount of training applied uphill in chronic stroke survivors. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation service. METHODS: Thirty-eight adults with hemiplegia from stroke lasting more than three months were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: 'UP' -- 45 minutes of physical therapy plus 30 minutes of treadmill with 5% ascending slope; and 'DOWN' -- 45 minutes of physical therapy plus 30 minutes of treadmill with 5% descending slope. Both groups were treated 5 times a week for six weeks. Patients were evaluated before treatment, at the end of treatment and after three months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the number of patients showing an improvement in 6-minute walking test (6MWT) greater than 50 m. Secondary outcome measures were: (1) number of patients showing a clinically relevant improvement of gait speed during 10-m walking test (10mWT); (2) number of patients showing an improvement in timed up and go (TUG) greater than minimal detectable change. RESULTS: Both groups had a significant improvement after treatment and at follow-up. At the end of treatment, compared to UP group, more patients in the DOWN group showed clinically significant improvements in primary and secondary outcomes (16/19 patients for 6MWT, 11/19 patients for 10mWT and 9/19 patients for TUG compared with 3/19, 4/19 and 2/19 patients, respectively, p < 0.01). At follow-up, results were similar except for 10mWT. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic stroke patients, downhill treadmill training produces a bigger effect than uphill training.
|