Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
A multicentre cluster-randomized controlled study to evaluate a train-the-trainer programme for implementing internal and external participation in medical rehabilitation [with consumer summary] |
Koerner M, Wirtz M, Michaelis M, Ehrhardt H, Steger A-K, Zerpies E, Bengel J |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2014 Jan;28(1):20-35 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of the train-the-trainer programme 'Fit for Shared Decision-Making' on internal (team) and external (patient) participation in medical rehabilitation from a patient and staff perspective. DESIGN: A multicentre, cluster-randomized controlled study. SETTING: Eleven medical rehabilitation clinics, divided into intervention and control groups. SUBJECTS: A staff and a patient survey were conducted pre- and post-intervention, plus a further patient survey six months later. INTERVENTION: Train-the-trainer programme 'Fit for Shared Decision-Making' for interprofessional settings. MAIN MEASURES: Each survey measured internal participation with a self-compiled six-item scale (Internal Participation Scale, IPS), and external participation by means of a nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for the patients and for healthcare professionals. RESULTS: Patient samples numbered 402 for the pre-, 463 for the post-intervention data collection period and 461 six months after the intervention. Patients' appraisal of external participation (F period x group (2) = 0.256, p = 0.774, eta2 = 0.000) showed no change, whereas internal participation (F period x group (2) = 3.785, p = 0.023, eta2 = 0.007) showed a significant increase. A total of 195 healthcare professionals participated in the pre- and 168 in the post-intervention staff survey. Here external participation was significantly enhanced in the intervention group (F period x group (1) = 4.893, p = 0.028, eta2 = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The train-the-trainer approach can be recommended for implementing internal and external participation in interprofessional settings such as medical rehabilitation clinics. However, there is a need for more intensive staff training for internal participation and an additional intervention for patients to achieve success in all aspects.
|