Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Is progressive early digit mobilization intervention beneficial for patients with external fixation of distal radius fracture? A pilot randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Kuo L-C, Yang T-H, Hsu Y-Y, Wu P-T, Lin C-L, Hsu H-Y, Jou I-M |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 Nov;27(11):983-993 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether progressive early digit mobilization resulted in better outcomes for hand stiffness and related functional results, as well as the effects on the bone healing process. DESIGN: Prospective, pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A university hospital in southern Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two patients with distal radius fracture randomized into two groups: early digit mobilization or control. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received 45 minutes per treatment session and three sessions per week until the external fixator was removed 6 weeks after fracture. The control group received usual home programmes. After removing fixators, both groups received regular rehabilitation programmes until 12 weeks after surgery. MAIN MEASURES: Hand strength, dexterity and functional outcomes were obtained using a dynamometer, Purdue pegboard and self-report assessment, respectively, and x-rays of the distal radius were taken to reveal bone healing 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. A motion tracking system measured various kinematic parameters. RESULTS: The recovery rates between the groups showed statistically significant differences in both thumb workspace (81.55% versus 69.54%, p = 0.04) and finger workspace (89.22% versus 59.97%, p = 0.03) 12 weeks after injury. However, no statistical differences were found in finger dexterity, strength and self-reported outcomes. The radiographic assessment showed no significant differences between the groups for radial inclination, radial height and volar tilt throughout the examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that early rehabilitative intervention for digits is applicable for distal radius fracture treatment, and does not produce additional bone deformities.
|