Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Metabolic and behavioral compensations in response to caloric restriction: implications for the maintenance of weight loss |
Redman LM, Heilbronn LK, Martin CK, de Jonge L, Williamson DA, Delany JP, Ravussin E, for the Pennington CALERIE Team |
PLoS ONE 2009 Feb;4(2):e4377 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Metabolic and behavioral adaptations to caloric restriction (CR) in free-living conditions have not yet been objectively measured. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Forty-eight (36.8 +/- 1.0 y), overweight (BMI 27.8 +/- 0.7 kg/m2) participants were randomized to four groups for 6-months; control: energy intake at 100% of energy requirements; CR: 25% calorie restriction; CR+EX: 12.5% CR plus 12.5% increase in energy expenditure by structured exercise; LCD: low calorie diet (890 kcal/d) until 15% weight reduction followed by weight maintenance. Body composition (DXA) and total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) over 14-days by doubly labeled water (DLW) and activity related energy activity (AREE) were measured after 3 (M3) and 6 (M6) months of intervention. Weight changes at M6 were -1.0 +/- 1.1% (control), -10.4 +/- 0.9% (CR), -10.0 +/- 0.8% (CR+EX) and -13.9 +/- 0.8% (LCD). At M3, absolute TDEE was significantly reduced in CR (-454 +/- 76 kcal/d) and LCD (-633 +/- 66 kcal/d) but not in CR+EX or controls. At M6 the reduction in TDEE remained lower than baseline in CR (-316 +/- 118 kcal/d) and LCD (-389 +/- 124 kcal/d) but reached significance only when CR and LCD were combined (-351 +/- 83 kcal/d). In response to caloric restriction (CR/LCD combined), TDEE adjusted for body composition, was significantly lower by -431 +/- 51 and -240 +/- 83 kcal/d at M3 and M6, respectively, indicating a metabolic adaptation. Likewise, physical activity (TDEE adjusted for sleeping metabolic rate) was significantly reduced from baseline at both time points. For control and CR+EX, adjusted TDEE (body composition or sleeping metabolic rate) was not changed at either M3 or M6. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time we show that in free-living conditions, CR results in a metabolic adaptation and a behavioral adaptation with decreased physical activity levels. These data also suggest potential mechanisms by which CR causes large inter-individual variability in the rates of weight loss and how exercise may influence weight loss and weight loss maintenance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00099151.
|