Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Self-management of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial of a group cognitive-behavioural therapy
Hewlett S, Ambler N, Almeida C, Cliss A, Hammond A, Kitchen K, Knops B, Pope D, Spears M, Swinkels A, Pollock J
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2011 Jun;70(6):1060-1067
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for fatigue self-management, compared with groups receiving fatigue information alone, on fatigue impact among people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two-arm, parallel randomised controlled trial in adults with RA, fatigue => 6/10 (visual analogue scale (VAS) 0 to 10, high bad) and no recent change in RA medication. Group CBT for fatigue self-management comprised six (weekly) 2 h sessions, and consolidation session (week 14). Control participants received fatigue self-management information in a 1 h didactic group session. Primary outcome at 18 weeks was the impact of fatigue measured using two methods (Multi-dimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) 0 to 50; VAS 0 to 10), analysed using intention-to-treat analysis of covariance with multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Of 168 participants randomised, 41 withdrew before entry and 127 participated. There were no major baseline differences between the 65 CBT and 62 control participants. At 18 weeks CBT participants reported better scores than control participants for fatigue impact: MAF 28.99 versus 23.99 (adjusted difference -5.48, 95% CI -9.50 to -1.46, p = 0.008); VAS 5.99 versus 4.26 (adjusted difference -1.95, 95% CI -2.99 to -0.90, p < 0.001). Standardised effect sizes for fatigue impact were MAF 0.59 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.03) and VAS 0.77 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.21), both in favour of CBT. Secondary outcomes of perceived fatigue severity, coping, disability, depression, helplessness, self-efficacy and sleep were also better in CBT participants. CONCLUSIONS: Group CBT for fatigue self-management in RA improves fatigue impact, coping and perceived severity, and well-being. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN32195100.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.annrheumdis.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help