Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparison of sleep quality with mechanical versus spontaneous ventilation during weaning of critically III tracheostomized patients
Roche-Campo F, Thille AW, Drouot X, Galia F, Margarit L, Cordoba-Izquierdo A, Mancebo J, d'Ortho M-P, Brochard L
Critical Care Medicine 2013 Jul;41(7):1637-1644
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: In mechanically ventilated patients under mechanical ventilation in the ICU, ventilatory mode or settings may influence sleep quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the direct impact of mechanical ventilation per se on sleep quantity and quality in patients who were able to tolerate separation from mechanical ventilation over prolonged periods. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized crossover clinical trial in a medical ICU. PATIENTS: Sixteen conscious patients, free of sedation and tracheostomized because of prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation, were included in the study when able to tolerate at least 5 hours of spontaneous ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either spontaneous ventilation or mechanical ventilation at low levels of pressure support for two crossover periods of 5-hour duration each, from 22:00 to 08:00. Polysomnography was performed throughout the study. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Total sleep time was higher during mechanical ventilation than during spontaneous ventilation (183 min versus 132 min, p = 0.04). No significant differences between mechanical ventilation and spontaneous ventilation were observed in slow wave sleep time (45 min versus 28 min), rapid eye movement sleep time (11 min versus 3 min), or the fragmentation index (25 versus 23 arousals and awakenings per hr). In four patients, however, our analysis of patient-ventilator interaction suggested that the ventilatory settings were suboptimal and could have been improved to potentially improve sleep. CONCLUSIONS: In difficult-to-wean tracheostomized patients, sleep quality was similar with or without the ventilator. Sleep quantity was higher during mechanical ventilation. Reconnection to the ventilator during the night period may favor sleep efficiency in tracheostomized patients in prolonged weaning.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help