Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Management of coronary risk factors by registered nurses versus usual care in patients with unstable angina pectoris (a CHest pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) substudy)
Allison TG, Farkouh ME, Smars PA, Evans RW, Squires RW, Gabriel SE, Kopecky SL, Gibbons RJ, Reeder GS, for the Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators
The American Journal of Cardiology 2000 Jul 15;86(2):133-138
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

This study examined whether nurses could manage coronary risk factors in patients with unstable angina more effectively than physicians practicing usual care. Three hundred twenty-six patients were randomized in the emergency room to a 6-month program of risk factor management by a registered nurse versus participation in usual care. The nurse intervention consisted of a 30-minute counseling visit at 6 to 10 days after the chest pain episode and a second 30-minute session 1 month later. Multiple risk factors were assessed and addressed: smoking, blood lipids, blood pressure, blood glucose, physical inactivity, weight, psychological stress, and social isolation. Compared with usual care, nurse intervention patients significantly reduced both triglycerides (-29 +/- 8 versus 5 +/- 6 mg/dl; p < 0.0004) and weight (-0.9 +/- 3.3 versus +0.1 +/- 2.1 kg; p = 0.0071), and had corresponding improvements in self-reported diet compliance and exercise (+34 +/- 106 versus +9 +/- 98 minutes, p = 0.0491). No significant differences between groups were observed in terms of 6-month changes in total, high-density lipoprotein, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, percent body fat or waist-hip ratio, or psychological distress scores. The 6-month rate of recurrent events (cardiac death, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction) and/or revascularizations (coronary artery bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty) was lower in the nurse intervention group (1% versus 9%; p = 0.002). We conclude that a nurse-delivered risk factor intervention program for patients with chest pain is feasible and more effective than usual care in terms of fostering lifestyle changes that may lower coronary risk.
With permission from Excerpta Medica Inc.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help