Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Management of coronary risk factors by registered nurses versus usual care in patients with unstable angina pectoris (a CHest pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) substudy) |
| Allison TG, Farkouh ME, Smars PA, Evans RW, Squires RW, Gabriel SE, Kopecky SL, Gibbons RJ, Reeder GS, for the Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators |
| The American Journal of Cardiology 2000 Jul 15;86(2):133-138 |
| clinical trial |
| 4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
This study examined whether nurses could manage coronary risk factors in patients with unstable angina more effectively than physicians practicing usual care. Three hundred twenty-six patients were randomized in the emergency room to a 6-month program of risk factor management by a registered nurse versus participation in usual care. The nurse intervention consisted of a 30-minute counseling visit at 6 to 10 days after the chest pain episode and a second 30-minute session 1 month later. Multiple risk factors were assessed and addressed: smoking, blood lipids, blood pressure, blood glucose, physical inactivity, weight, psychological stress, and social isolation. Compared with usual care, nurse intervention patients significantly reduced both triglycerides (-29 +/- 8 versus 5 +/- 6 mg/dl; p < 0.0004) and weight (-0.9 +/- 3.3 versus +0.1 +/- 2.1 kg; p = 0.0071), and had corresponding improvements in self-reported diet compliance and exercise (+34 +/- 106 versus +9 +/- 98 minutes, p = 0.0491). No significant differences between groups were observed in terms of 6-month changes in total, high-density lipoprotein, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, percent body fat or waist-hip ratio, or psychological distress scores. The 6-month rate of recurrent events (cardiac death, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction) and/or revascularizations (coronary artery bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty) was lower in the nurse intervention group (1% versus 9%; p = 0.002). We conclude that a nurse-delivered risk factor intervention program for patients with chest pain is feasible and more effective than usual care in terms of fostering lifestyle changes that may lower coronary risk.
|