Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Feasibility and acceptability of a Tai Chi Chih randomized controlled trial in senior female cancer survivors
Campo RA, O'Connor K, Light KC, Nakamura Y, Lipschitz DL, LaStayo PC, Pappas L, Boucher K, Irwin MR, Agarwal N, Kinney AY
Integrative Cancer Therapies 2013 Nov;12(6):464-474
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a Tai Chi Chih (TCC) intervention in senior female cancer survivors with physical functioning limitations, and its effects on health-related quality of life (QOL). DESIGN: This was a two-armed, parallel group, RCT with 12-weeks of Tai Chi Chih or health education control. METHOD: Sixty-three senior (mean age 67 years, SD 7.15) female cancer survivors (83% breast cancer, stages I to III) with physical functioning limitations (SF-12 Health Survey role-physical and physical functioning subscales) were randomized to 12-weeks of TCC or health education control (HEC). Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included health-related QOL (SF-36 Health Survey), and participants' qualitative feedback on the intervention. RESULT: Retention (TCC 91%; HEC 81%) and class attendance (TCC 79%; HEC 83%) rates, and satisfaction levels for both study arms were high, but did not significantly differ from one another. At one-week post-intervention, none of the SF-36 scores differed between the TCC and HEC groups. Within-group analyses revealed significant improvements in the mental component summary score in TCC (p = 0.01), but not in HEC. Qualitative analyses indicated that the TCC group felt they received mental and physical benefits, whereas HEC group reported on social support benefits and information received. CONCLUSION: The TCC intervention was found to be a feasible and acceptable modality for senior female cancer survivors. Future, larger definitive trials are needed to clarify TCC dosage effects on QOL in this vulnerable population.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help