Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparison of three weight maintenance programs on cardiovascular risk, bone and vitamins in sedentary older adults
Christensen P, Frederiksen R, Bliddal H, Riecke BF, Bartels EM, Henriksen M, Juul-Sorensen T, Gudbergsen H, Winther K, Astrup A, Christensen R
Obesity 2013 Oct;21(10):1982-1990
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: Obese patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) are encouraged to lose weight to obtain symptomatic relief. Risk of vascular events is higher in people with OA compared to people without arthritis. Our aim in this randomized trial was to compare changes in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-factors, nutritional health, and body composition after 1-year weight-loss maintenance achieved by (D) diet, (E) knee-exercise, or (C) control, following weight loss by low-energy-diet. DESIGN AND METHODS: Obese individuals (n = 192, > 50 years) with knee OA, 63 years (SD 6), weight 103.2 kg (15.0), body-mass index 37.3 kg/m2 (4.8), were enrolled into a 68-week weight-loss trial. RESULTS: Mean changes in weight, in D, E, and C were -11.0, -6.3, and -8.3 kg (p = 0.002). Reduction in waist circumference in D, E, and C were -8.4, -4.6, and -7.0 cm (p = 0.007). D reduced waist circumference significantly more than E: -3.8 cm (95%CI -6.2 to -1.4; p = 0.0024). There was no difference between the groups in changes in CVD risk factors; blood pressure, triglycerides, and cholesterol. Nutritional health was improved in all groups. For markers of bone, no statistical difference was found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary support, or control, maintained improvements in cardiovascular risk factors to the same extent and none of the interventions had a detrimental effect on bone.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help