Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial
Cotchett MP, Munteanu SE, Landorf KB
Physical Therapy 2014 Aug;94(8):1083-1094
clinical trial
9/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Plantar heel pain can be managed with dry needling of myofascial trigger points, however there is only poor quality evidence supporting its use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling for plantar heel pain. DESIGN: Parallel group, participant blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A university health sciences clinic. PATIENTS: Study participants were 84 patients with plantar heel pain of at least one month's duration. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomised to real or sham trigger point dry needling. The intervention consisted of one treatment per week for six weeks. Participants were followed for 12 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measures included 'first-step pain' measured with a visual analogue scale and foot pain measured with the pain subscale of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. The primary end-point for predicting the effectiveness of dry needling for plantar heel pain was six weeks. RESULTS: At the primary end-point, significant effects favored real dry needling over sham dry needling for pain (adjusted mean difference: VAS first-step pain -14.4 mm, 95% CI -23.5 to -5.2, p = 0.002; FHSQ foot pain 10.0 points, 95% CI 1.0 to 19.1, p = 0.029), although the between-group difference was lower than the minimal important difference. The number needed to treat at six weeks was 4 (95% CI 2 to 12). The frequency of minor transitory adverse events was significantly greater in the real dry needling group (70 real dry needling appointments (32%) compared with only 1 sham dry needling appointment (< 1%)). LIMITATIONS: It was not possible to blind the therapist. CONCLUSION: Dry needling provided statistically significant improvements in plantar heel pain, but the magnitude of this effect should considered against the frequency of minor transitory adverse events.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help