Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
The effects of elastic tubing-based resistance training compared with conventional resistance training in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized clinical trial [with consumer summary] |
Ramos EMC, de Toledo-Arruda AC, Fosco LC, Bonfim R, Bertolini GN, Guarnier FA, Cecchini R, Pastre CM, Langer D, Gosselink R, Ramos D |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2014 Nov;28(11):1096-1106 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of elastic tubing training compared with conventional resistance training on the improvement of functional exercise capacity, muscle strength, fat-free mass, and systemic inflammation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, eight-week clinical trial. SETTING: The study was conducted in a university-based, outpatient, physical therapy clinic. SUBJECTS: A total of 49 patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to perform elastic tubing training or conventional resistance training three times per week for eight weeks. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was functional exercise capacity. The secondary outcome measures were peripheral muscle strength, health-related quality of life assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ), fat-free mass, and cytokine profile. RESULTS: After eight weeks, the mean distance covered during six minutes increased by 73 meters (+/- 69) in the elastic tubing group and by 42 meters (+/- 59) in the conventional group (p < 0.05). The muscle strength and quality of life improved in both groups (p < 0.05), with no significant differences between the groups. There was a trend toward an improved fat-free mass in both groups (p = 0.05). After the first and last sessions, there was an increase in interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) and interleukin 10 (IL-10) in both groups, while tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) was stimulated only in the conventional training group. CONCLUSION: Elastic tubing training had a greater effect on functional exercise capacity than conventional resistance training. Both interventions were equally effective in improving muscle strength and quality of life.
|