Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Multimodal treatment of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy in diabetic patients: a randomized clinical trial [with consumer summary]
Taveggia G, Villafane JH, Vavassori F, Lecchi C, Borboni A, Negrini S
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2014 May;37(4):242-252
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of analyzing treadmill, muscle strengthening, and balance training compared with a standard care intervention in patients with diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients, 63% female (mean +/- standard deviations age 72 +/- 9 years), with diabetic neuropathy randomly assigned to receive a multimodal manual treatment approach including analyzing treadmill with feedback focused, isokinetic dynamometric muscle strengthening, and balance retraining on dynamic balance platform or a standard care intervention for activities targeted to improve endurance, manual exercises of muscle strengthening, stretching exercises, gait, and balance exercises (5 weekly over 4 weeks). This study was designed as a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Measures were assessed at pretreatment, 4 weeks posttreatment, and 2-month follow-up. RESULTS: No important baseline differences were observed between groups. At the end of the treatment period, the experimental group showed a significant increase in gait endurance in a 6-minute walk test, 65.6 m (F[2.0] = 9.636; p = 0.001). In addition, the 6-minute walk test increased after the intervention, and an even greater difference was found at follow-up (p = 0.005) for the standard care group. The Functional Independence Measure in both groups increased (p < 0.01) and continued until the follow-up in the standard care group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the experimental rehabilitation program showed positive effects on the gait endurance after 4 weeks of treatment, whereas it did not produce significant improvements of the gait speed. Both the treatments produced significant improvement of functionalities of the patient.
Reprinted from the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics with copyright permission from the National University of Health Sciences.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help