Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Multimodal treatment of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy in diabetic patients: a randomized clinical trial [with consumer summary] |
Taveggia G, Villafane JH, Vavassori F, Lecchi C, Borboni A, Negrini S |
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2014 May;37(4):242-252 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of analyzing treadmill, muscle strengthening, and balance training compared with a standard care intervention in patients with diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients, 63% female (mean +/- standard deviations age 72 +/- 9 years), with diabetic neuropathy randomly assigned to receive a multimodal manual treatment approach including analyzing treadmill with feedback focused, isokinetic dynamometric muscle strengthening, and balance retraining on dynamic balance platform or a standard care intervention for activities targeted to improve endurance, manual exercises of muscle strengthening, stretching exercises, gait, and balance exercises (5 weekly over 4 weeks). This study was designed as a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Measures were assessed at pretreatment, 4 weeks posttreatment, and 2-month follow-up. RESULTS: No important baseline differences were observed between groups. At the end of the treatment period, the experimental group showed a significant increase in gait endurance in a 6-minute walk test, 65.6 m (F[2.0] = 9.636; p = 0.001). In addition, the 6-minute walk test increased after the intervention, and an even greater difference was found at follow-up (p = 0.005) for the standard care group. The Functional Independence Measure in both groups increased (p < 0.01) and continued until the follow-up in the standard care group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the experimental rehabilitation program showed positive effects on the gait endurance after 4 weeks of treatment, whereas it did not produce significant improvements of the gait speed. Both the treatments produced significant improvement of functionalities of the patient.
|