Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Karpal tunel sendromunda dusuk enerjili lazer ve kesikli ultrason tedavi etkinliklerinin karsilastirilmasi: plasebo kontrollu bir calisma (Comparison of the efficacy of low-level laser therapy and pulsed ultrasound treatment in carpal tunnel syndrome: a placebo-controlled study) [Turkish] |
Tikiz C, Duruoz T, Unlu Z, Cerrahoglu L, Yalcinsoy E |
Turkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi [Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation] 2013;59(3):201-208 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of low-level laser treatment (LLLT) and pulsed ultrasound (US) treatment in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to compare the effects of both treatment modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 60 patients diagnosed with CTS were randomly divided into four groups as US group (group 1), placebo US group (group 2), LLLT group (group 3) and plasebo LLLT group (group 4). Both treatments were applied five days a week for three weeks. Clinical and electrophysiological assessments were performed before and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Pain, hypoesthesia and handgrip strength were evaluated. The Boston Questionnaire was used to assess the severity of symptoms and functional status. RESULTS: 52 patients with 101 hands completed the study. Demographic and electrophysiological parameters were similar in the four groups. Both pulsed US treatment and LLLT were found to provide significant improvements in clinical parameters such as pain, sensory loss, symptom severity score and functional capacity score (p < 0.05). No significant beneficial effect was observed in both placebo groups (p < 0.05). Evaluations of the electrophysiological parameters showed no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). In terms of clinical efficacy, pulsed US was found to be superior to LLLT (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The two treatment modalities showed significant improvements in subjective clinical symptoms while no significant changes were observed in any electrophysiological parameters.
|