Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy after endotracheal extubation: a randomized crossover physiologic study [with consumer summary] |
Rittayamai N, Tscheikuna J, Rujiwit P |
Respiratory Care 2014 Apr;59(4):485-490 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
Copyright release for this abstract has not been granted.
|