Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Systematic review and meta-analysis of noninvasive cranial nerve neuromodulation for nervous system disorders
Papa L, la Mee A, Tan CN, Hill-Pryor C
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014 Jan;95(12):2435-2443
systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the medical literature and comprehensively summarize clinical research done on rehabilitation with a novel portable and non-invasive electrical stimulation device, called the cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulator (CN-NINM) in patients suffering from nervous system disorders. The CN-NINM induces processes of neuroplasticity by noninvasive stimulation of four cranial nerves and targets the subcortical area of the brain. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1966 to March 2013. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they recruited adult patients with peripheral and central nervous system disorders and were treated with CN-NINM and were assessed with objective measures of function. DATA EXTRACTION: After title and abstract screening of potential articles, full texts were independently reviewed to identify articles that met inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search identified twelve publications, five were critically reviewed and two combined in a meta-analysis. There were no randomized controlled studies identified and the meta-analysis was based on pre-post studies. Most of the patients were individuals with a chronic balance dysfunction. The pooled results demonstrated significant improvements in (1) Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) post-intervention with a mean difference 3.45 (1.75 to 5.15; p < 0.001); (2) the ABC scale with a mean difference of 16.65 (7.65 to 25.47; p < 0.001); and (3) the DHI with improvements of -26.07 (-35.78 to -16.35; p < 0.001). Included studies suffered from small sample sizes, lack of randomization, absence of blinding, use of referral populations, and variability in treatment schedules and follow-up rates. CONCLUSIONS: Given these limitations, the results of the meta-analysis must be interpreted cautiously. Further investigation using rigorous randomized clinical controlled trials are needed to evaluate this promising rehabilitation tool for nervous system disorders.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help