Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| The efficacy and safety of prone positional ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: updated study-level meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials |
| Lee JM, Bae W, Lee YJ, Cho Y-J |
| Critical Care Medicine 2014 May;42(5):1252-1262 |
| systematic review |
|
OBJECTIVE: The survival benefit of prone positioning during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome has been a matter of debate. Recent multicenter randomized controlled trials have shown a significant reduction of 28-day and 90-day mortality associated with prone positioning during mechanical ventilation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis on this topic and elucidated the effect of prone positioning on overall mortality and associated complications. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference proceedings through May 2013. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trial comparing overall mortality of prone-versus-supine positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted for populations, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. The prespecified primary endpoint was overall mortality, using the longest available follow-up in each study. The odds ratio with 95% CI was the effect measure. DATA SYNTHESIS: This analysis included 11 randomized controlled trial, 2,246 total adult patients, and 1,142 patients ventilated in the prone position. Prone positioning during ventilation significantly reduced overall mortality in the random-effect model (odds ratio 0.77; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.99; p = 0.039; I2 = 33.7%), and the effects were marked in the subgroup in which the duration of prone positioning was more than 10 hr/session, compared with the subgroup with a short-term duration of prone positioning (odds ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79; p = 0.039; p-interaction = 0.015). Prone positioning was significantly associated with pressure ulcers (odds ratio 1.49; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.89; p = 0.001; I2 = 0.0%) and major airway problems (odds ratio 1.55; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.17; p = 0.012; I2 = 32.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Ventilation in the prone position significantly reduced overall mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sufficient duration of prone positioning was significantly associated with a reduction in overall mortality. Prone ventilation was also significantly associated with pressure ulcers and major airway problems. A brief summary and a critical assessment of this review may be available at DARE |