Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Combined exercise and motivation program: effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
Friedrich M, Gittler G, Halberstadt Y, Cermak T, Heiller I
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998 May;79(5):475-487
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a combined exercise and motivation program on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic and recurrent low back pain. DESIGN: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Physical therapy outpatient department, tertiary care. PATIENTS: Ninety-three low back pain patients were randomly assigned to either a standard exercise program (n = 49) or a combined exercise and motivation program (n = 44). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were prescribed 10 physical therapy sessions and were advised to continue exercising after treatment termination. The motivation program consisted of five compliance-enhancing interventions. Follow-up assessments were performed at 3 1/2 weeks, 4 months, and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability (low back outcome score), pain intensity, physical impairment (modified Waddell score, fingertip-to-floor distance, abdominal muscle strength), working ability, motivation, and compliance. RESULTS: The patients in the motivation group were significantly more likely to attend their exercise therapy appointments (p = 0.0005). Four and 12 months after study entry there was a significant difference in favor of the motivation group with regard to the disability score (p = 0.004) and pain intensity (p <= 0.026). At 4 months, there was a significant advantage for the motivation group in the fingertip-to-floor distance (p = 0.01) and in abdominal muscle strength (p = 0.018). No significant differences were found in motivation scores, self-reported compliance with long-term exercise, and modified Waddell score. In terms of working ability, there was a trend favoring the combined exercise and motivation program. CONCLUSION: The combined exercise and motivation program increased the rate of attendance at scheduled physical therapy sessions, ie, short-term compliance, and reduced disability and pain levels by the 12-month follow-up. However, there was no difference between the motivation and control groups with regard to long-term exercise compliance.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help