Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Effect of diode laser in the treatment of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
| Vallone F, Benedicenti S, Sorrenti E, Schiavetti I, Angiero F |
| Photomedicine and Laser Surgery 2014 Sep;32(9):490-494 |
| clinical trial |
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
BACKGROUND DATA: Low back pain is a common, highly debilitating condition, whose severity is variable. This study evaluated the efficacy of treatment with Ga-Al-As diode laser (980nm) with a large diameter spot (32cm2), in association with exercise therapy, in reducing pain. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the pain reduction efficacy of treatment with the Ga-Al-As diode laser (980nm) in combination with exercise therapy, in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: This study evaluated 100 patients with CLBP (mean age 60 years) who were randomly assigned to two groups. The laser plus exercises group (laser+EX: 50 patients) received low-level laser therapy (LLLT) with a diode laser, 980nm, with a specific handpiece (32cm2 irradiation spot size, power 20W in continuous wave (CW), fluence 37.5J/cm2, total energy per point 1,200J) thrice weekly, and followed a daily exercise schedule for 3 weeks (5 days/week). The exercises group (EX: 50 patients) received placebo laser therapy plus daily exercises. The outcome was evaluated on the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), before and after treatment. RESULTS: At the end of the 3 week period, the Laser+EX group showed a significantly greater decrease in pain than did the EX group. There was a significant difference between the two groups, with average VAS scores of 3.96 (laser+EX group) and 2.23 (EX group). The Student's t test demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the two groups, at p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the use of diode laser (980nm) with large diameter spot size, in association with exercise therapy, appears to be effective. Such treatment might be considered a valid therapeutic option within rehabilitation programs for nonspecific CLBP.
|