Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Skeletal response to resistance and impact training in prostate cancer survivors
Winters-Stone KM, Dobek JC, Bennett JA, Maddalozzo GF, Ryan CW, Beer TM
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2014 Aug;46(8):1482-1488
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with significant bone loss and an increase in fracture risk among prostate cancer survivors (PCS). We investigated whether impact plus resistance training could stop ADT-related declines in bone mineral density (BMD) among PCS on ADT. METHODS: We randomized 51 PCS (mean age 70.2 yr) currently prescribed ADT to participate in 1 yr of impact plus resistance training (Prevent Osteoporosis with Impact plus Resistance (POWIR)) or in an exercise placebo program of stretching exercise (FLEX). Outcomes were proximal femur (total hip, femoral neck, and greater trochanter) and spine (L1 to L4) BMD (gcm) and bone turnover markers (serum osteocalcin (ngmL) and urinary deoxypyrodinoline cross-links (nmolmmol Cr)). RESULTS: Retention in the 1-yr study was 84% and median attendance to supervised classes was 84% in POWIR and 74% in FLEX. No study-related injuries were reported. There were no significant differences between groups for average L1 to L4 BMD or for BMD at any hip site. When examining individual vertebrae, POWIR has a significant effect on preservation of BMD (-0.4%) at the L4 vertebrae compared with losses (-3.1%) in FLEX (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Impact plus resistance training was a safe and acceptable form of exercise for older PCS on ADT. Among our limited sample, POWIR did not appear to have a clinically meaningful effect on hip or spine BMD, but some evidence of skeletal adaptation to resistance plus impact training in an androgen-deprived state was apparent. Future studies need to be conducted on a larger sample of patients and should consider modifications to POWIR that could further enhance loading across the spine and at the hip to preserve BMD at these clinically relevant sites.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help