Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Eccentric training for prevention of hamstring injuries may depend on intervention compliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis [with consumer summary]
Goode AP, Reiman MP, Harris L, de Lisa L, Kauffman A, Beltramo D, Poole C, Ledbetter L, Taylor AB
British Journal of Sports Medicine 2015 Mar;49(6):349-356
systematic review

BACKGROUND: Hamstring injury is a prevalent muscle injury in sports. Inconclusive evidence exists for eccentric hamstring strengthening to prevent hamstring injuries. One reason for this discrepancy may be the influence intervention non-compliance has on individual study estimates, and therefore pooled estimates. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to determine the effect of eccentric hamstring strengthening on the risk of hamstring injury and quantitatively explores the impact of intervention non-compliance on the precision, heterogeneity and strength of pooled estimates. METHODS: A computer-assisted literature search of Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, AMED, SPORTDiscus and PEDro databases was conducted with keywords related to eccentric strengthening and hamstring injury. The search was conducted from the end of a previous comprehensive review forward (1 December 2008 to 31 December 2013). Random-effects models were used for both main effects and a sensitivity analysis. Pooled estimate precision was measured with a confidence limit ratio (confidence limit ratio (CLR); upper limit divided by the lower limit) and heterogeneity was assessed with I2, Cochrane's-Q and tau2. A protocol was not registered for this review. RESULTS: Four out of 349 studies met the inclusion criteria. In main effects analysis, eccentric hamstring training did not reduce the risk of hamstring injury (risk ratio (RR) 0.59 ((95% CI 0.24 to 1.44)). This estimate was imprecise (CLR = 6.0) with significant heterogeneity (p value 0.02, 69.6% variation and t2 = 0.57). Subjects compliant with eccentric strengthening had a significant (RR 0.35 ((95% CI 0.23 to 0.55)) reduction in hamstring injuries. This estimate was precise (CLR = 2.4) and homogenous (p value = 0.38, 2.8% variation and t2 = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The null-biased effect in using intent-to-treat methods from intervention non-compliance has a substantial impact on the precision, heterogeneity and the direction and strength of pooled estimates. Eccentric strengthening, with good compliance, appears to be successful in prevention of hamstring injury.
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help