Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Pressure pain sensitivity changes after use of shock-absorbing insoles among young soccer players training on artificial turf: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Madeleine P, Hoej BP, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Rathleff MS, Kaalund S
The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2014 Aug;44(8):587-594
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: Shock-absorbing insoles (SAIs), compared with usual insoles, were hypothesized to result in larger increases in pressure pain threshold (PPT) after 3 weeks of use. BACKGROUND: Shock-absorbing insoles can decrease self-reported pain among young soccer players training on artificial turf. However, nothing is known about the underlying changes in pain sensitivity assessed by PPT. METHODS: Seventy-five players were included from the youth teams of under 15, under 17, and under 19 years of age, playing for the Aalborg Boldspilklub (AaB) professional sports club. After a randomization stratified by team and age, players were divided into 2 groups, one that received SAIs and a control group that used their usual insoles. Assessments were made in both groups after 3 weeks of training on artificial turf (baseline) and 3 weeks later (follow-up). The primary outcome was change in PPTs from baseline to follow-up, with PPTs measured over 13 locations on the plantar surface of the foot, leg, and low back of the nonpreferred kicking leg. RESULTS: A significantly larger increase was found in PPTs from baseline to follow-up for the SAI group compared with the control group (mean difference 62 kPa; 95% confidence interval (CI) 40 to 85 kPa). The PPTs increased significantly more among the SAI group compared with the control group (p < 0.05) for the abductor digiti minimi (mean difference 82 kPa; 95% CI 6 to 157 kPa), tibialis anterior (mean difference 125 kPa; 95% CI 20 to 230 kPa), medial gastrocnemius (mean difference 83 kPa; 95% CI -6 to 171 kPa), and erector spinae (mean difference 86 kPa; 95% CI -17 to 188 kPa). CONCLUSION: The use of SAIs resulted in increased PPTs after 3 weeks of training on artificial turf compared with controls, suggesting a protective role of SAIs in pressure sensitivity and pain perception.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help