Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The results of a 2-year randomized trial of a worksite weight management intervention [with consumer summary]
Williams AE, Stevens VJ, Albright CL, Nigg CR, Meenan RT, Vogt TM
American Journal of Health Promotion 2014 May-Jun;28(5):336-339
clinical trial
2/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: We assessed the effectiveness of a worksite management intervention (the 3W program) for overweight and obese hotel employees. DESIGN: The program was tested in a 2-year cluster-randomized trial involving 30 hotels that employed nearly 12,000 individuals. SETTING: All participating hotels were on Oahu, Hawaii. The intervention was implemented within hotel worksites. SUBJECTS: Participants were included in the analysis if they had an initial body mass index (BAH) > 25, were assessed at least twice, were not missing other data needed for the analysis, and did not switch to employment at a hotel in a different experimental condition. Of the 6,519 employees we assessed, data from 1,207 individuals (intervention = 598; control = 610) met these criteria and contributed to the analysis. INTERVENTION: The intervention had two components: (1) group meetings and (2) a workplace environment intervention. MEASURES: Weight and waist to height ratio (WHtR) were measured at three annual assessments. ANALYSIS: The effect of the intervention on change in BMI and WHtR was estimated in hierarchical mixed regression models using full maximum likelihood to estimate model parameters. RESULTS: The effects on change in BMI and WHtR were in the expected direction but were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The 3W program was not effective. The low intensity of the intervention may have contributed to its ineffectiveness.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help