Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Chest compression with a higher level of pressure support ventilation: effects on secretion removal, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics in patients on mechanical ventilation
da Silva Naue W, Forgiarini Junior LA, Dias AS, Vieira SRR
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):55-60
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of chest compression accompanied by a 10-cmH2O increase in baseline inspiratory pressure on pressure support ventilation, in comparison with that of aspiration alone, in removing secretions, normalizing hemodynamics, and improving respiratory mechanics in patients on mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This was a randomized crossover clinical trial involving patients on mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h in the ICU of the Porto Alegre Hospital de Clinicas, in the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Patients were randomized to receive aspiration alone (control group) or compression accompanied by a 10-cmH2O increase in baseline inspiratory pressure on pressure support ventilation (intervention group). We measured hemodynamic parameters, respiratory mechanics parameters, and the amount of secretions collected. RESULTS: We included 34 patients. The mean age was 64.2 +/- 14.6 years. In comparison with the control group, the intervention group showed a higher median amount of secretions collected (1.9 g versus 2.3 g; p = 0.004), a greater increase in mean expiratory tidal volume (16 +/- 69 mL versus 56 +/- 69 mL; p = 0.018), and a greater increase in mean dynamic compliance (0.1 +/- 4.9 cmH2O versus 2.8 +/- 4.5 cmH2O; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, chest compression accompanied by an increase in pressure support significantly increased the amount of secretions removed, the expiratory tidal volume, and dynamic compliance. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01155648 (http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov/)).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help