Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparative effects of light or heavy resistance power training for improving lower extremity power and physical performance in mobility-limited older adults
Reid KF, Martin KI, Doros G, Clark DJ, Hau C, Patten C, Phillips EM, Frontera WR, Fielding RA
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2015 Mar;70(3):374-380
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: We compared the effects of two uniquely different lower extremity power training interventions on changes in muscle power, physical performance, neuromuscular activation, and muscle cross sectional area in mobility-limited older adults. METHODS: Fifty-two subjects (78 +/- 5 years, short physical performance battery score 8.1 +/- 1) were randomized to either 16 weeks of progressive high velocity resistance training performed at low external resistance (40% of the 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) (LO)) or high external resistance (70% of 1RM (HI)). Both groups completed three sets of leg and knee extension exercises at maximum voluntary velocity, two times per week. Neuromuscular activation was assessed using surface electromyography and muscle cross sectional area (CSA) was measured using computed tomography. RESULTS: At 16 weeks, LO and HI exhibited significant and similar within-group increases of leg extensor peak power (about 34% versus about 42%), strength (about 13% versus about 19%), and SPPB score (1.4 +/- 0.3 versus 1.8 +/- 0.3 units), respectively (all p < 0.03). Improvements in neuromuscular activation occurred in LO (p = 0.03) while small gains in mid-thigh muscle CSA were detected in LO (1.6%, p = 0.35) and HI (2.1%, p = 0.17). No significant between-group differences were evident for any measured parameters (all p > 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: High velocity resistance training with low external resistance yields similar improvements in muscle power and physical performance compared to training with high external resistance in mobility-limited elders. These findings may have important implications for optimizing exercise interventions for older adults with mobility limitations.
Copyright the Gerontological Society of America. Reproduced by permission of the publisher.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help